<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Standards and the OPAC/ILS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://about.scriblio.net/scribbles/132/standards-and-the-opacils/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://about.scriblio.net/scribbles/132/standards-and-the-opacils/</link>
	<description>open source software for libraries</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 20:59:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: libdev &#187; BBC Archive Catalogue</title>
		<link>http://about.scriblio.net/scribbles/132/standards-and-the-opacils/#comment-1644</link>
		<dc:creator>libdev &#187; BBC Archive Catalogue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Nov 2005 03:02:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libdev.plymouth.edu/post/18#comment-1644</guid>
		<description>[...] In a recent post here I mentioned a thread on XML4Lib that discussed standards in libraries. It has evolved into a discussion regarding the various non-library standards and their use in the library catalog. If you haven&#8217;t been reading it I highly recommend to. The discussion has brought up many ideas and problems and discussions about the various technologies. This hit home today when I saw the following: Ever wondered what&#8217;s in that archive? Who looks after it? It turns out there&#8217;s a huge database that&#8217;s been carefully tended by a gang of crack BBC librarians for decades. Nearly a million programmes are catalogued, with descriptions, contributor details and annotations drawn from a wonderfully detailed controlled vocabulary. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In a recent post here I mentioned a thread on XML4Lib that discussed standards in libraries. It has evolved into a discussion regarding the various non-library standards and their use in the library catalog. If you haven&#8217;t been reading it I highly recommend to. The discussion has brought up many ideas and problems and discussions about the various technologies. This hit home today when I saw the following: Ever wondered what&#8217;s in that archive? Who looks after it? It turns out there&#8217;s a huge database that&#8217;s been carefully tended by a gang of crack BBC librarians for decades. Nearly a million programmes are catalogued, with descriptions, contributor details and annotations drawn from a wonderfully detailed controlled vocabulary. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: libdev &#187; COinS-PMH and Microformats</title>
		<link>http://about.scriblio.net/scribbles/132/standards-and-the-opacils/#comment-1643</link>
		<dc:creator>libdev &#187; COinS-PMH and Microformats</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 21:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libdev.plymouth.edu/post/18#comment-1643</guid>
		<description>[...] I recently posted here regarding standards and libraries, specifically the need for lightweight APIs/formats for use in various projects. I also mentioned an article over at darcus blog regarding light vs complex, and there is even a bet that lightweight will win over heavyweight. While that can be debated, there is definitely a place for lightweight implementations. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I recently posted here regarding standards and libraries, specifically the need for lightweight APIs/formats for use in various projects. I also mentioned an article over at darcus blog regarding light vs complex, and there is even a bet that lightweight will win over heavyweight. While that can be debated, there is definitely a place for lightweight implementations. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ebyblog</title>
		<link>http://about.scriblio.net/scribbles/132/standards-and-the-opacils/#comment-1642</link>
		<dc:creator>ebyblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 01:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://libdev.plymouth.edu/post/18#comment-1642</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Libraries and Standards&lt;/strong&gt;

	I&#8217;ve posted over at LibDev regarding standards in library systems. I&#8217;ll probably be posting some more over there though I&#8217;ll try to keep my rants here. Having mostly worked with open-source and similar formats it feels strange going ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Libraries and Standards</strong></p>
<p>	I&#8217;ve posted over at LibDev regarding standards in library systems. I&#8217;ll probably be posting some more over there though I&#8217;ll try to keep my rants here. Having mostly worked with open-source and similar formats it feels strange going &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>